For every success claim, request the written methodology. Ask for the population included and excluded, sample size, time period, definition of success, follow-up interval, response rate, handling of people lost to follow-up, and whether an independent party reviewed the analysis. Also ask whether the figure applies to cannabis-related treatment, a broader population, one location, or an entire organization. If those details are absent, mark the claim needs review rather than accepting or rejecting it on presentation alone.
Testimonials can describe one person’s reported experience, but they do not establish a typical outcome or predict yours. Accreditation can be relevant to a quality review, yet it is not a promise of safety, sobriety, recovery, or results. SAMHSA quality guidance supports asking about licensing, accreditation, evidence-supported care, family involvement, and continuing-care planning. NIDA principles emphasize that needs differ and that plans should address the individual rather than substance use alone. No outcome or success rate for Living Longer Recovery is established by the public facts provided here.
- Request the full methodology behind every percentage or success statement.
- Check whether the measured group resembles the population described in the marketing claim.
- Keep testimonials, accreditation, and outcome data in separate rows because they answer different questions.