For any outcome claim, request the written methodology. Ask what “success” means, who was counted, how many people were included, how missing follow-up data were handled, who collected the information, and when. Determine whether the number describes completion, abstinence at a defined point, reduced use, engagement in continuing care, satisfaction, or something else. These measures are not interchangeable. If the facility cannot provide enough information to interpret the figure, mark it needs review or not established.
Accreditation, licensing, and awards are also separate categories. Ask for the accrediting or licensing body, the relevant entity or location, credential identifier if applicable, scope, and expiration or current-status evidence. A logo alone is not sufficient verification. California DHCS is the public source for the Living Longer Recovery facility record cited in this article. The known record should not be stretched into claims about accreditation, outcomes, staffing, or services beyond the exact public facts. SAMHSA recommends asking about licensing, accreditation, evidence-supported care, family involvement, and continuing-care planning. These are questions to investigate, not proof that a facility meets a standard.
- How is “success” defined, and at what follow-up point?
- Who was included, and how large was the group?
- Were people lost to follow-up, and how were they counted?which location and legal entity does the credential apply? can I independently confirm current status?